Authorship Statement

This work was conceived and directed by Lucky Zhuge (诸葛鑫). All conceptual frameworks, mathematical formulations, state-space design, and experimental design were authored by the primary researcher. Claude (Anthropic) was used exclusively for:

• Language refinement and academic writing assistance
• Mathematical notation formatting and LaTeX structuring
• Literature search and citation suggestions
• Cross-lingual translation (Chinese ↔ English)
• Formal verification scaffolding and symbolic reasoning support

The primary author retains full intellectual ownership and responsibility for all conceptual claims, design decisions, results, and interpretations presented in this paper. This work demonstrates a human-centered AI collaboration model in which a non-specialist researcher directs, and AI tools assist — not the reverse.

Abstract

Ensuring safety, consistency, and explainability in AI decision-making remains a fundamental challenge, particularly in open-ended and high-risk interaction scenarios. This paper introduces CNSH-64 (Cultural-Normative Symbolic Hierarchy, 64-State), a governance-aware symbolic decision framework that unifies structured state modeling, multi-dimensional risk evaluation, and formally verifiable ethical constraints into a single, auditable computational pipeline.

Inspired by the 64 hexagrams of the I-Ching (Yijing, 易经), CNSH-64 models interaction contexts as compositional symbolic states within a finite 64-state space ($S times S = 8 times 8$), enabling explicit reasoning over decision boundaries and cross-cultural sensitivity. The framework comprises three core mechanisms:

Multi-dimensional risk evaluation:

$\text{risk}(c) = \alpha R + \beta U + \gamma I$

where $R$ denotes Threat Level, $U$ denotes Confidence Entropy, and $I$ denotes Cultural Value Incongruence — jointly optimized via gradient-free search over symbolic policy space.

Constraint-based ethical decision mechanism:

$\text{Eth}: A \rightarrow \{0,1\}, \quad \text{subject to } \mathcal{C} \models \phi_{\text{eth}}$

where $\mathcal{C}$ is a formal ontology of cultural norms and $\phi_{\text{eth}}$ encodes universal ethical principles in first-order logic.